EssaysFeatureRace

A Tale Of Two Communities Dispels Model Minority Myths

Asian Americans as the 'Model Minority'

The comparative success of Asian Americans on earnings and educational indicators has given rise to the “model minority” myth, which proposes that, through hard work and studiousness, Asians across the board have achieved economic success.

One of the troublesome assumptions of this myth is that it overlooks the great diversity of circumstances and outcomes of Asian groups in the United States. Asians are not a monolithic group; the nearly 2.5 million Asian residents of the New York City metropolitan area are both native and foreign-born, immigrated to the United States recently or decades ago, and come from countries that are stable and prosperous as well as poorly governed and impoverished. These different journeys result in residents with very different capabilities and well-being outcomes. Stereotypes that paint them as one homogenous group can result in some getting lost in the numbers, left out of efforts to make sure every child reaches their full potential.

Two metro area communities illustrate the widely diverging circumstances. Superficially, the Brooklyn communities of Bensonhurst and Bath Beach have a lot in common with Southwest Middlesex County in New Jersey. Both have similar population sizes (115,000 in Southwest Middlesex and 188,000 in Bensonhurst) and are roughly 40 percent Asian and 45 percent White with the remainder of the population mainly Latino in the Bensonhurst area and Black in Southwest Middlesex. In both, roughly seven in 10 of the Asian residents are immigrants. Broad health outcomes in both are very good, with average life expectancies of 82.5 years in the Bensonhurst area and 83.9 years in Southwest Middlesex.

While demographically similar, however, these two communities’ financial numbers are worlds apart. The typical worker in Southwest Middlesex earns about $52,000 annually, well above the metro area median of roughly $39,000. In Brooklyn’s Bensonhurst and Bath Beach, median earnings are $27,000, a striking $25,000 difference. This gap in turn manifests itself in an array of other differences; Southwest Middlesex residents are nearly twice as likely to own their homes (64 percent as compared with 34 percent in Bensonhurst) and have lower rates of poverty (six percent vs. 20 percent) and child poverty (six percent vs. 28 percent). Zeroing in on the Asian populations in these two communities, the gap is even more pronounced. The overall earnings gap between Asians, $50,000, is double the actual earnings in Bensonhurst. For men, the Asian earnings gap is a whopping $70,000. While the earnings of Asian women in Southwest Middlesex are on par with the area’s median, Asian men earn nearly twice that — close to $100,000.

This pair of neighborhoods is a stark example of Asian diversity — both economic and geographic. Nearly 90 percent of Bensonhurst-area Asians trace their roots to China, while 70 percent of Middlesex Asians are of Indian background. Indians have the highest earnings of the eight most-populous Asian subgroups in the New York metro area, almost $53,000. Chinese residents land in the middle of the pack with earnings just under $35,500, while Bangladeshis are at the bottom.

The generalization that all Asian Americans are economically secure hurts communities like Bensonhurst and Bath Beach, as well as Chinese New Yorkers and other groups whose day-to-day realities are far from what Asian-wide data might suggest. And this goes beyond earnings; a recent study found that wealth inequality is much greater among Asians, many of whom have little to no assets to fall back on, than among Whites. The enormous economic diversity underneath the Asian average makes the disaggregation of data by subgroup vital in order to identify areas of need, a challenge that the Asian nonprofit community is well aware of and that can (and should) be addressed through data-collecting efforts.

Kristen Lewis is director and Sarah Burd-Sharps was formerly co-director of Measure of America. Measure of America, a non-partisan project of the non-profit Social Science Research Council, provides easy-to-use yet methodologically sound tools for understanding well-being and opportunity in America. Through reports, online tools, and evidence-based research, we work with partners to breathe new life into numbers, using data to identify areas of need, pinpoint levers of change, and track progress over time. This article was originally published by Urban Matters. This week, Urban Matters continues our ongoing occasional series drawn from “A Portrait of New York City 2018: Well-Being in the Five Boroughs and the Greater Metro Area,” a recent report by Measure of America, a project of the Social Science Research Council.

A Portrait of New York City 2018: Well-being in the Five Boroughs and the Greater Metro Area examines well-being and access to opportunity for different geographic groups in New York City and the greater New York-New Jersey-Connecticut Metropolitan area using the Human Development Framework and Index. This report also examines a range of issues that contribute to and/or are compounded by the well-being challenges faced by man New York City communities, such as child poverty, health inequities, racism, and residential segregation. 

Also for you:

Kristen Lewis

Previous post

Civilization or Barbarism?

Next post

All Votes Must Be Counted, or Why Concessions of Electoral Defeat Are Irrelevant